<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 667 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234082</link>
    <description>Stay on recovery of the disputed tax demand was found to require a reasonable and proportionate payment schedule, especially where the assessment was described as high-pitched and hardship to the assessee had been acknowledged. The court therefore moderated the revised monthly instalment condition to align with the earlier arrangement and the assessee&#039;s financial position. It also directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to dispose of the pending appeal within three months, to ensure timely adjudication of the substantive dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 11:47:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 667 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234082</link>
      <description>Stay on recovery of the disputed tax demand was found to require a reasonable and proportionate payment schedule, especially where the assessment was described as high-pitched and hardship to the assessee had been acknowledged. The court therefore moderated the revised monthly instalment condition to align with the earlier arrangement and the assessee&#039;s financial position. It also directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to dispose of the pending appeal within three months, to ensure timely adjudication of the substantive dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>