https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234074 The High Court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that the petitioners should have utilized the available appellate remedy through the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The court highlighted that the failure to challenge the denial of cross-examination and the rush to the High Court without exhausting the appellate process rendered the writ petition inappropriate. It was clarified that the dismissal did not prevent the petitioners from challenging other proceedings if aggrieved, and the period during which the writ petition was pending was excluded from the limitation period for filing an appeal before the CESTAT. en-us Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 May 2013 10:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234074 The High Court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that the petitioners should have utilized the available appellate remedy through the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The court highlighted that the failure to challenge the denial of cross-examination and the rush to the High Court without exhausting the appellate process rendered the writ petition inappropriate. It was clarified that the dismissal did not prevent the petitioners from challenging other proceedings if aggrieved, and the period during which the writ petition was pending was excluded from the limitation period for filing an appeal before the CESTAT. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234074