https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234071 The judgment highlighted the inconsistency in the treatment of appealability of interlocutory orders by different High Courts regarding pre-deposit of duty/penalty by CESTAT. The need for clarity on whether appeals lie against CESTAT's interlocutory orders under specific sections of the Excise Act and Customs Act was emphasized. The judgment directed the matter to be referred to a Larger Bench to decide on the appealability of such orders. en-us Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Nov 2013 13:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234071 The judgment highlighted the inconsistency in the treatment of appealability of interlocutory orders by different High Courts regarding pre-deposit of duty/penalty by CESTAT. The need for clarity on whether appeals lie against CESTAT's interlocutory orders under specific sections of the Excise Act and Customs Act was emphasized. The judgment directed the matter to be referred to a Larger Bench to decide on the appealability of such orders. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234071