<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 650 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234065</link>
    <description>Used digital multifunction print and copying machines were analysed against the hazardous-waste classification under the Hazardous Waste Rules and the foreign trade restriction regime. The text states that the machines were not shown to be mere electrical or electronic assemblies within Basel Entry B1110, so they did not fall within the hazardous-waste definition. It also explains that a notification issued on 5 June 2012 operated prospectively and, absent clear retrospective language, could not be used to deny clearance of imports made earlier. On that basis, the goods were treated as not subject to the later restriction for those imports.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 650 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234065</link>
      <description>Used digital multifunction print and copying machines were analysed against the hazardous-waste classification under the Hazardous Waste Rules and the foreign trade restriction regime. The text states that the machines were not shown to be mere electrical or electronic assemblies within Basel Entry B1110, so they did not fall within the hazardous-waste definition. It also explains that a notification issued on 5 June 2012 operated prospectively and, absent clear retrospective language, could not be used to deny clearance of imports made earlier. On that basis, the goods were treated as not subject to the later restriction for those imports.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>