<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 649 - Guwahati High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234064</link>
    <description>The amended section 8B of the Assam Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1939 applied to assessment year 2009-2010 even though it came into force during the financial year, because the Act charges agricultural income in the assessment year on the basis of the previous year&#039;s income. The amendment validly imposed liability on the relevant class of assessees for that assessment year, and the connected advance tax and interest provisions operated as part of the same statutory scheme. Reliance on J.K. Synthetics was treated as inapposite because the Act expressly provided for advance-tax liability and the corresponding interest consequences. The challenge to applicability therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 649 - Guwahati High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234064</link>
      <description>The amended section 8B of the Assam Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1939 applied to assessment year 2009-2010 even though it came into force during the financial year, because the Act charges agricultural income in the assessment year on the basis of the previous year&#039;s income. The amendment validly imposed liability on the relevant class of assessees for that assessment year, and the connected advance tax and interest provisions operated as part of the same statutory scheme. Reliance on J.K. Synthetics was treated as inapposite because the Act expressly provided for advance-tax liability and the corresponding interest consequences. The challenge to applicability therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>