<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 648 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234063</link>
    <description>Estimated turnover additions based on unreliable books of account were upheld because the assessee had not maintained proper records and the authorities had assessed liability on the material before them. The Tribunal, as the final fact-finding authority, affirmed the appellate order, and the High Court found no legal infirmity in those concurrent findings. Estimation of turnover was treated as a question of fact, so revision under section 58 of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008 could not be maintained absent any question of law. The revisions were therefore not entertained and the Tribunal&#039;s order remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 07:54:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 648 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234063</link>
      <description>Estimated turnover additions based on unreliable books of account were upheld because the assessee had not maintained proper records and the authorities had assessed liability on the material before them. The Tribunal, as the final fact-finding authority, affirmed the appellate order, and the High Court found no legal infirmity in those concurrent findings. Estimation of turnover was treated as a question of fact, so revision under section 58 of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008 could not be maintained absent any question of law. The revisions were therefore not entertained and the Tribunal&#039;s order remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>