<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 646 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234061</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties imposed on the appellant for service tax liability on commercial coaching services. The penalties were waived due to the succession of ownership and discontinuation of coaching classes by different family members, as per Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s payment of service tax and interest was confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 646 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234061</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties imposed on the appellant for service tax liability on commercial coaching services. The penalties were waived due to the succession of ownership and discontinuation of coaching classes by different family members, as per Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s payment of service tax and interest was confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>