<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 626 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234041</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Review Order did not comply with Section 35E of the Central Excise Act, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The failure to meet the statutory requirements rendered the appeal not maintainable, emphasizing the importance of procedural adherence in legal proceedings and the critical review of decisions by competent authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 626 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234041</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Review Order did not comply with Section 35E of the Central Excise Act, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The failure to meet the statutory requirements rendered the appeal not maintainable, emphasizing the importance of procedural adherence in legal proceedings and the critical review of decisions by competent authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>