https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234033 The High Court converted the writ petition into an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, directing the appellant to deposit differential court fees. The Court modified the pre-deposit amount from &8377; 80 crores to &8377; 25 crores, considering the tax demand and penalty. The dispute over service tax on free calls provided to employees involved interpretation of CBEC Circulars, with the Court determining a reasonable pre-deposit amount of &8377; 25 crores. The judgment aimed to ensure fairness and compliance with legal principles in addressing these issues. en-us Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234033 The High Court converted the writ petition into an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, directing the appellant to deposit differential court fees. The Court modified the pre-deposit amount from &8377; 80 crores to &8377; 25 crores, considering the tax demand and penalty. The dispute over service tax on free calls provided to employees involved interpretation of CBEC Circulars, with the Court determining a reasonable pre-deposit amount of &8377; 25 crores. The judgment aimed to ensure fairness and compliance with legal principles in addressing these issues. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234033