<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 617 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234032</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the condonation application for a 40-day delay in filing an appeal, citing lack of evidence and valid reasoning. The judge emphasized the importance of diligence in legal matters and the necessity of providing justifiable reasons for seeking condonation of delay. The decision underscores the critical role of evidence and valid reasoning in such applications, leading to the dismissal of the stay petition and appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 617 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234032</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the condonation application for a 40-day delay in filing an appeal, citing lack of evidence and valid reasoning. The judge emphasized the importance of diligence in legal matters and the necessity of providing justifiable reasons for seeking condonation of delay. The decision underscores the critical role of evidence and valid reasoning in such applications, leading to the dismissal of the stay petition and appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>