<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 611 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234026</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete a portion of the addition made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The Tribunal found no evidence of a nexus between interest-free funds and investments generating exempt income. Relying on precedent and past assessments, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order and concluding the legal proceedings on the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 17:56:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 611 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234026</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete a portion of the addition made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The Tribunal found no evidence of a nexus between interest-free funds and investments generating exempt income. Relying on precedent and past assessments, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order and concluding the legal proceedings on the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>