https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234013 The bench ordered a second de novo adjudication in the case involving Oxford Rubber Pvt. Ltd. and others due to errors in handling contentions, including the limitation issue, separate show-cause notice, cross-examination of witnesses, and quantification of duty. The adjudicating authority was directed to conduct the adjudication afresh following principles of natural justice, setting aside the previous order. The need for proper consideration of cross-examination requests, correct quantification of duty, and justification for enhanced penalties were emphasized for a fair process. en-us Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Sep 2018 09:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234013 The bench ordered a second de novo adjudication in the case involving Oxford Rubber Pvt. Ltd. and others due to errors in handling contentions, including the limitation issue, separate show-cause notice, cross-examination of witnesses, and quantification of duty. The adjudicating authority was directed to conduct the adjudication afresh following principles of natural justice, setting aside the previous order. The need for proper consideration of cross-examination requests, correct quantification of duty, and justification for enhanced penalties were emphasized for a fair process. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234013