<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 588 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234003</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to verify the current year&#039;s bank statement balance and determine the taxable income from the account, ensuring it is lower than the peak credit taxed in the previous year. The decision highlights the significance of accounting for previously taxed amounts and peak credits in assessing the taxable income from undisclosed bank deposits under section 69 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 08:46:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 588 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234003</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to verify the current year&#039;s bank statement balance and determine the taxable income from the account, ensuring it is lower than the peak credit taxed in the previous year. The decision highlights the significance of accounting for previously taxed amounts and peak credits in assessing the taxable income from undisclosed bank deposits under section 69 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>