<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 577 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233992</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing negligence on the part of the applicant and lack of a valid reason for the delay. Consequently, the stay petition and the appeal were also dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely action and adherence to statutory time limits in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 577 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233992</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing negligence on the part of the applicant and lack of a valid reason for the delay. Consequently, the stay petition and the appeal were also dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely action and adherence to statutory time limits in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>