<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 557 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233972</link>
    <description>An employer is not treated as an assessee in default for short deduction of tax at source where salary income is estimated bona fide and honestly; performance incentive linked to achievement criteria could be excluded from salary for house rent allowance computation, so demands under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) were unsustainable. Payments for link charges, telephone charges and bandwidth charges were not fees for technical services because the connectivity and data carriage were provided through equipment and network infrastructure without human intervention; therefore no deduction obligation arose under section 194J, and the corresponding demand under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:53:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 557 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233972</link>
      <description>An employer is not treated as an assessee in default for short deduction of tax at source where salary income is estimated bona fide and honestly; performance incentive linked to achievement criteria could be excluded from salary for house rent allowance computation, so demands under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) were unsustainable. Payments for link charges, telephone charges and bandwidth charges were not fees for technical services because the connectivity and data carriage were provided through equipment and network infrastructure without human intervention; therefore no deduction obligation arose under section 194J, and the corresponding demand under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>