<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 524 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233939</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT KOLKATA addressed the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated after the four-year limit and the eligibility of deduction under section 10A of the IT Act. The Tribunal ruled the reassessment invalid as there was no failure to disclose material facts, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Regarding the deduction under section 10A, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the deduction based on the nature of the assessee&#039;s activities and consistency in treatment. The Tribunal&#039;s emphasis on disclosure requirements and precedent resulted in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals in both cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 524 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233939</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT KOLKATA addressed the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated after the four-year limit and the eligibility of deduction under section 10A of the IT Act. The Tribunal ruled the reassessment invalid as there was no failure to disclose material facts, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Regarding the deduction under section 10A, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the deduction based on the nature of the assessee&#039;s activities and consistency in treatment. The Tribunal&#039;s emphasis on disclosure requirements and precedent resulted in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals in both cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>