<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 518 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233933</link>
    <description>Subsequent events linked to the core oppression and mismanagement allegations could be considered, and the absence of a formal amendment application was not treated as fatal where the parties had notice and amendment had already been allowed. A proposed alteration of the object clause and related postal ballot was not finally restrained at the proposal stage, as the matter required fuller factual reconsideration by the Tribunal. An investigative audit of the company&#039;s financial transactions was set aside because the record did not provide a sufficient prima facie basis for such an inquiry. The alleged conflict-of-interest issue was also left open for further examination in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:59:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 518 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233933</link>
      <description>Subsequent events linked to the core oppression and mismanagement allegations could be considered, and the absence of a formal amendment application was not treated as fatal where the parties had notice and amendment had already been allowed. A proposed alteration of the object clause and related postal ballot was not finally restrained at the proposal stage, as the matter required fuller factual reconsideration by the Tribunal. An investigative audit of the company&#039;s financial transactions was set aside because the record did not provide a sufficient prima facie basis for such an inquiry. The alleged conflict-of-interest issue was also left open for further examination in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>