https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233927 The Tribunal held that cross-objections cannot substitute a statutory appeal. As the appellant failed to file a separate appeal against the confirmed demand within the limitation period, they were directed to deposit the confirmed amount of Rs. 2.33 lakhs. The Tribunal stressed the significance of following statutory appeal procedures and limitations, emphasizing compliance with the deposit requirement. Compliance verification was scheduled for a specified date. en-us Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Jul 2014 11:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233927 The Tribunal held that cross-objections cannot substitute a statutory appeal. As the appellant failed to file a separate appeal against the confirmed demand within the limitation period, they were directed to deposit the confirmed amount of Rs. 2.33 lakhs. The Tribunal stressed the significance of following statutory appeal procedures and limitations, emphasizing compliance with the deposit requirement. Compliance verification was scheduled for a specified date. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233927