<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 492 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233907</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal, ruling that the penalty imposed on the assessee was set aside as the additions to income were in accordance with the judgment of the jurisdictional Court. The Court found that there was no concealment of income or inaccurate particulars furnished by the assessee, leading to the penalty order being overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:25:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 492 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233907</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal, ruling that the penalty imposed on the assessee was set aside as the additions to income were in accordance with the judgment of the jurisdictional Court. The Court found that there was no concealment of income or inaccurate particulars furnished by the assessee, leading to the penalty order being overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>