<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 486 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233901</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision on the cenvat credit demands and penalties, based on the evidence and submissions presented during the proceedings. The dispute over cenvat credit on scrap received from a registered dealer involved allegations of inflated production and bogus invoices. The Tribunal found no issue with setting aside a demand of Rs. 87,106 but upheld a demand of Rs. 20,409 based on a statement from a supplier&#039;s partner indicating no material supplied since 2000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 486 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233901</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision on the cenvat credit demands and penalties, based on the evidence and submissions presented during the proceedings. The dispute over cenvat credit on scrap received from a registered dealer involved allegations of inflated production and bogus invoices. The Tribunal found no issue with setting aside a demand of Rs. 87,106 but upheld a demand of Rs. 20,409 based on a statement from a supplier&#039;s partner indicating no material supplied since 2000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>