<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 451 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233866</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the electroplating process undertaken amounted to manufacture, exempting the appellant from paying service tax. Additionally, the appellant was found eligible for exemption under Notification No.8/2005-ST, despite supplying goods to a client with conditional exemption. As a result, the appellant was not liable for service tax and could benefit from the exemption notification, leading to a favorable outcome in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 451 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233866</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the electroplating process undertaken amounted to manufacture, exempting the appellant from paying service tax. Additionally, the appellant was found eligible for exemption under Notification No.8/2005-ST, despite supplying goods to a client with conditional exemption. As a result, the appellant was not liable for service tax and could benefit from the exemption notification, leading to a favorable outcome in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>