<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 444 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233859</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer. The penalties were removed due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to properly initiate penalty proceedings and the debatable nature of the issues involved, which did not warrant penalties for concealment or furnishing inaccurate income particulars. The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, affirming the deletion of penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 10:05:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 444 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233859</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer. The penalties were removed due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to properly initiate penalty proceedings and the debatable nature of the issues involved, which did not warrant penalties for concealment or furnishing inaccurate income particulars. The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, affirming the deletion of penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>