<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 438 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233853</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, remanding the issues of the applicability of section 14A and the disallowance of Rs. 21,400/- for un-reconciled interest figures back to the Assessing Officer for re-examination. The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s claim regarding the expenditure on playground repairs, treating it as revenue expenditure. The order was pronounced on April 5, 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 10:05:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 438 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233853</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, remanding the issues of the applicability of section 14A and the disallowance of Rs. 21,400/- for un-reconciled interest figures back to the Assessing Officer for re-examination. The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s claim regarding the expenditure on playground repairs, treating it as revenue expenditure. The order was pronounced on April 5, 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>