<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 435 - Securities and Exchange Board of India</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233850</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the investors&#039; claim for compensation for losses incurred in purchasing shares from a listed company, stating that SEBI lacked jurisdiction to grant such compensation. However, SEBI was directed to investigate the misleading advertisements by the company and take action if fraudulent practices were discovered. The stock exchange was instructed to cooperate with SEBI in the investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 435 - Securities and Exchange Board of India</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233850</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the investors&#039; claim for compensation for losses incurred in purchasing shares from a listed company, stating that SEBI lacked jurisdiction to grant such compensation. However, SEBI was directed to investigate the misleading advertisements by the company and take action if fraudulent practices were discovered. The stock exchange was instructed to cooperate with SEBI in the investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>