<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 396 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233811</link>
    <description>The court held that the appellant successfully established a prima facie case regarding the agreement for providing business support services, contrary to the CESTAT&#039;s decision. The court allowed the appeal, granting a waiver of pre-deposit of service tax dues. The court emphasized that its observations were limited to the stay application and would not affect the final disposal of the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 396 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233811</link>
      <description>The court held that the appellant successfully established a prima facie case regarding the agreement for providing business support services, contrary to the CESTAT&#039;s decision. The court allowed the appeal, granting a waiver of pre-deposit of service tax dues. The court emphasized that its observations were limited to the stay application and would not affect the final disposal of the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>