https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233809 The tribunal rejected the condonation of delay application and dismissed the appeal due to a significant delay of 1043 days in filing the appeal. The appellant's reasons for the delay were deemed not bona fide as they failed to demonstrate diligence in following up with the advocate or ensuring timely preparation and filing of necessary documents. The absence of a certificate from the advocate further weakened the appellant's case, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as barred by limitation. The judgment highlights the importance of diligence and providing a satisfactory explanation for condonation of delay. en-us Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233809 The tribunal rejected the condonation of delay application and dismissed the appeal due to a significant delay of 1043 days in filing the appeal. The appellant's reasons for the delay were deemed not bona fide as they failed to demonstrate diligence in following up with the advocate or ensuring timely preparation and filing of necessary documents. The absence of a certificate from the advocate further weakened the appellant's case, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as barred by limitation. The judgment highlights the importance of diligence and providing a satisfactory explanation for condonation of delay. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233809