<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 388 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233803</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the notice under Section 148 and subsequent proceedings due to lack of legal backing. The judgment highlighted the importance of meeting the conditions for reopening assessments beyond the prescribed period. The writ petition was allowed, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 388 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233803</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the notice under Section 148 and subsequent proceedings due to lack of legal backing. The judgment highlighted the importance of meeting the conditions for reopening assessments beyond the prescribed period. The writ petition was allowed, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>