<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 387 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233802</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the disallowance of labor charges paid to three parties, directing the AO to re-decide after allowing the assessee to present evidence. The disallowance of foreign traveling expenses was upheld as the appellant failed to prove business purposes. However, the ad hoc disallowance of telephone expenses was deleted by the ITAT. Similarly, the ad hoc disallowance of conveyance, repairs, and maintenance expenses was also deleted due to lack of basis. The disallowance of interest on a motor car loan was overturned as it was found to be deductible under section 36(1)(iii). Other related disallowances were not disputed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 387 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233802</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the disallowance of labor charges paid to three parties, directing the AO to re-decide after allowing the assessee to present evidence. The disallowance of foreign traveling expenses was upheld as the appellant failed to prove business purposes. However, the ad hoc disallowance of telephone expenses was deleted by the ITAT. Similarly, the ad hoc disallowance of conveyance, repairs, and maintenance expenses was also deleted due to lack of basis. The disallowance of interest on a motor car loan was overturned as it was found to be deductible under section 36(1)(iii). Other related disallowances were not disputed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>