<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 384 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233799</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to re-examine the miscellaneous expenditure claim after verifying the necessary details provided by the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper verification and examination by the AO before allowing the expenditure claim, setting aside the orders of the AO and CIT (A) and directing examination of the expenses after furnishing details.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 384 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233799</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to re-examine the miscellaneous expenditure claim after verifying the necessary details provided by the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper verification and examination by the AO before allowing the expenditure claim, setting aside the orders of the AO and CIT (A) and directing examination of the expenses after furnishing details.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>