<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 380 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233795</link>
    <description>Bagasse generated during sugar manufacture is treated as residue or waste, not a manufactured final product, and the same reasoning is applied to press mud. A tariff entry for bagasse does not, by itself, make the material a dutiable final product or create excise liability. On that basis, administrative circulars and demand notices seeking duty on bagasse are liable to be quashed, and duty and interest paid under protest are refundable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 380 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233795</link>
      <description>Bagasse generated during sugar manufacture is treated as residue or waste, not a manufactured final product, and the same reasoning is applied to press mud. A tariff entry for bagasse does not, by itself, make the material a dutiable final product or create excise liability. On that basis, administrative circulars and demand notices seeking duty on bagasse are liable to be quashed, and duty and interest paid under protest are refundable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>