https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233791 A writ petition challenging a confiscation-related order and refusal to permit removal of plant and machinery was not entertained because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the Central Excise framework. The Court declined to examine the merits or factual disputes concerning service, delay, or confiscation, holding that the petitioner should pursue the appellate remedy against the original adjudication order. The decision underscores that writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be invoked where the statute provides a direct appeal against the impugned order. en-us Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 May 2013 11:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233791 A writ petition challenging a confiscation-related order and refusal to permit removal of plant and machinery was not entertained because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the Central Excise framework. The Court declined to examine the merits or factual disputes concerning service, delay, or confiscation, holding that the petitioner should pursue the appellate remedy against the original adjudication order. The decision underscores that writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be invoked where the statute provides a direct appeal against the impugned order. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233791