<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 366 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233781</link>
    <description>A time-bound precondition requiring payment of the entire duty, interest and 25% penalty within the stipulated period was treated as mandatory, and no power to relax that condition was found. Because the unpaid amount was cleared only after the period fixed in the order-in-original, the appeal was held not maintainable and the rejection of the appeal was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 11:56:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 366 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233781</link>
      <description>A time-bound precondition requiring payment of the entire duty, interest and 25% penalty within the stipulated period was treated as mandatory, and no power to relax that condition was found. Because the unpaid amount was cleared only after the period fixed in the order-in-original, the appeal was held not maintainable and the rejection of the appeal was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>