<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 352 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233767</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed a petition challenging the validity of Press Notes related to Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) policies. The Court found that necessary amendments to the Foreign Exchange Management Regulations had been made in accordance with the law, and as there was no challenge to these amendments, the contention against the Press Notes lacked merit. The Court upheld the legality and authority of the FDI Policy, emphasizing its benefits for consumers, farmers, and product quality. It affirmed the Central Government&#039;s competence in formulating FDI policies and highlighted the limited role of the judiciary in interfering with policy decisions unless unconstitutional or arbitrary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 352 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233767</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed a petition challenging the validity of Press Notes related to Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) policies. The Court found that necessary amendments to the Foreign Exchange Management Regulations had been made in accordance with the law, and as there was no challenge to these amendments, the contention against the Press Notes lacked merit. The Court upheld the legality and authority of the FDI Policy, emphasizing its benefits for consumers, farmers, and product quality. It affirmed the Central Government&#039;s competence in formulating FDI policies and highlighted the limited role of the judiciary in interfering with policy decisions unless unconstitutional or arbitrary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>