<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 348 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233763</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision, affirming that the Company Law Board (CLB) has the authority to compound offences under Section 211(7) of the Companies Act without requiring prior permission from the criminal court. The court clarified that the CLB&#039;s power to compound offences is independent of the criminal court&#039;s powers, and both entities have parallel authority in this regard. The appeal was dismissed without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 348 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233763</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision, affirming that the Company Law Board (CLB) has the authority to compound offences under Section 211(7) of the Companies Act without requiring prior permission from the criminal court. The court clarified that the CLB&#039;s power to compound offences is independent of the criminal court&#039;s powers, and both entities have parallel authority in this regard. The appeal was dismissed without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>