<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 343 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233758</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the duty demand of Rs.3,00,020/- against a fabric manufacturing business due to lack of evidence linking shortages to non-compliance with the compounded levy scheme. The rejection of the application for the scheme did not justify the duty confirmation. Consequently, the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal for penalty imposition was rejected as it became irrelevant post-duty confirmation reversal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 343 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233758</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the duty demand of Rs.3,00,020/- against a fabric manufacturing business due to lack of evidence linking shortages to non-compliance with the compounded levy scheme. The rejection of the application for the scheme did not justify the duty confirmation. Consequently, the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal for penalty imposition was rejected as it became irrelevant post-duty confirmation reversal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>