<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 342 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233757</link>
    <description>The Tribunal considered the correct classification of Maize Starch under Chapter 11 or Chapter 35, noting the confusion regarding deemed manufacture in repacking activities. The Commissioner&#039;s order classified the product under Chapter 35, leading to multiple challenges and pending proceedings. The Tribunal referenced a previous case where Maize Starch was classified under Chapter 11, indicating that repacking would not constitute manufacture if so. Emphasizing the importance of resolving the dispute, the Tribunal granted unconditional stay, setting aside the order, and remanding the matter for decision after finality at M/s Anil Products, effectively disposing of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 10:43:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 342 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233757</link>
      <description>The Tribunal considered the correct classification of Maize Starch under Chapter 11 or Chapter 35, noting the confusion regarding deemed manufacture in repacking activities. The Commissioner&#039;s order classified the product under Chapter 35, leading to multiple challenges and pending proceedings. The Tribunal referenced a previous case where Maize Starch was classified under Chapter 11, indicating that repacking would not constitute manufacture if so. Emphasizing the importance of resolving the dispute, the Tribunal granted unconditional stay, setting aside the order, and remanding the matter for decision after finality at M/s Anil Products, effectively disposing of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>