<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 330 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233745</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notice issued under Section 148 for reopening the assessment, dated 21.11.2011, for the Assessment Year 2007-2008. The court found the notice invalid as it was based on an audit objection without independent assessment by the Assessing Officer, indicating a lack of belief that income had escaped assessment. Additionally, the court held that reopening based on a change of opinion was impermissible, referencing precedents. The Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to independently apply his mind and the violation of procedural requirements led to the court allowing the petition with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 330 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233745</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notice issued under Section 148 for reopening the assessment, dated 21.11.2011, for the Assessment Year 2007-2008. The court found the notice invalid as it was based on an audit objection without independent assessment by the Assessing Officer, indicating a lack of belief that income had escaped assessment. Additionally, the court held that reopening based on a change of opinion was impermissible, referencing precedents. The Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to independently apply his mind and the violation of procedural requirements led to the court allowing the petition with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>