<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 327 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233742</link>
    <description>The court held that the petitioner had made full and true disclosures during the original assessment, and there was no failure to disclose material facts. Consequently, the reopening of the assessment beyond the four-year period was not permissible. The court quashed the impugned notice dated 7.3.2012, allowing the petition and disposing of the case accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 10:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 327 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233742</link>
      <description>The court held that the petitioner had made full and true disclosures during the original assessment, and there was no failure to disclose material facts. Consequently, the reopening of the assessment beyond the four-year period was not permissible. The court quashed the impugned notice dated 7.3.2012, allowing the petition and disposing of the case accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>