<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 320 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233735</link>
    <description>Exemption under a conditional drug notification requires strict compliance with its terms. Where a medicine contains a non-scheduled ingredient, that ingredient must be affirmatively shown to be a pharmaceutical necessity and therapeutically inert, without interfering with the therapeutic or prophylactic activity of the scheduled ingredient. On the record, there was no material evidence or chemical report establishing that dextrose met those conditions, and the controlling Supreme Court precedent was not properly addressed. The exemption was therefore not available, and the product did not qualify for the notification benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 320 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233735</link>
      <description>Exemption under a conditional drug notification requires strict compliance with its terms. Where a medicine contains a non-scheduled ingredient, that ingredient must be affirmatively shown to be a pharmaceutical necessity and therapeutically inert, without interfering with the therapeutic or prophylactic activity of the scheduled ingredient. On the record, there was no material evidence or chemical report establishing that dextrose met those conditions, and the controlling Supreme Court precedent was not properly addressed. The exemption was therefore not available, and the product did not qualify for the notification benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>