https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233728 The Tribunal ruled against the appellant regarding liability for service tax during the warranty period due to insufficient evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant's obligation to provide detailed evidence to support their claims. Additionally, the Tribunal ordered the appellant to deposit Rs. 1 lakh to protect the Revenue's interests during dispute resolution and expedite the case's disposal by the Commissioner (Appeals). The directive aimed to ensure a fair consideration of the case without imposing taxes on goods, beyond the Finance Act's scope. en-us Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 May 2013 12:38:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233728 The Tribunal ruled against the appellant regarding liability for service tax during the warranty period due to insufficient evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant's obligation to provide detailed evidence to support their claims. Additionally, the Tribunal ordered the appellant to deposit Rs. 1 lakh to protect the Revenue's interests during dispute resolution and expedite the case's disposal by the Commissioner (Appeals). The directive aimed to ensure a fair consideration of the case without imposing taxes on goods, beyond the Finance Act's scope. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233728