<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 281 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233696</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalties by the CIT(Appeals) under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The penalties were deemed inappropriate as the additions were based on the conduct of brokers and improbability of transactions rather than concrete evidence of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The appeals by the revenue were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 19:46:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 281 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233696</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalties by the CIT(Appeals) under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The penalties were deemed inappropriate as the additions were based on the conduct of brokers and improbability of transactions rather than concrete evidence of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The appeals by the revenue were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>