https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233687 The challenge to the Customs House Agents Licensing (Amendment) Regulations, 2010 was governed by the Court's earlier binding ruling in Sunil Kohli, and once the Revenue ed that position and Circular No. 06/2013 deleted the contrary paragraphs from Circular No. 09/2010-Customs, the High Court's contrary relief could not stand. The dispute also concerned whether candidates who had passed the Regulation 9 examination under the 1984 Regulations were entitled to a licence without clearing additional subjects under the 2004 Regulations. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and applied the earlier decision, with the matter disposed of in favour of the Revenue. en-us Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233687 The challenge to the Customs House Agents Licensing (Amendment) Regulations, 2010 was governed by the Court's earlier binding ruling in Sunil Kohli, and once the Revenue ed that position and Circular No. 06/2013 deleted the contrary paragraphs from Circular No. 09/2010-Customs, the High Court's contrary relief could not stand. The dispute also concerned whether candidates who had passed the Regulation 9 examination under the 1984 Regulations were entitled to a licence without clearing additional subjects under the 2004 Regulations. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and applied the earlier decision, with the matter disposed of in favour of the Revenue. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233687