<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 267 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233682</link>
    <description>Under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the Commissioner (Appeals) can condone delay only within the additional 30-day statutory period after the initial 60 days. Where an appeal is filed beyond that outer limit, the appellate authority lacks power to extend limitation further. On the facts noted, the appeal was filed 67 days late, beyond the condonable span, so the rejection of the appeal was consistent with the statutory scheme and the dismissal was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 15:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 267 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233682</link>
      <description>Under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the Commissioner (Appeals) can condone delay only within the additional 30-day statutory period after the initial 60 days. Where an appeal is filed beyond that outer limit, the appellate authority lacks power to extend limitation further. On the facts noted, the appeal was filed 67 days late, beyond the condonable span, so the rejection of the appeal was consistent with the statutory scheme and the dismissal was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>