<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 258 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233673</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal and reinstating the original adjudication order related to service tax demand, penalties, and interest on advertising agency services. The decision emphasized the legitimacy of invoking the extended period of limitation due to the assessee&#039;s suppression of taxable value, rejecting the appellate authority&#039;s reversal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 258 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233673</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal and reinstating the original adjudication order related to service tax demand, penalties, and interest on advertising agency services. The decision emphasized the legitimacy of invoking the extended period of limitation due to the assessee&#039;s suppression of taxable value, rejecting the appellate authority&#039;s reversal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>