<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 254 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233669</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing appeals by both the Revenue and the assessee. The treatment of license fees as income from house property and the disallowance of depreciation on assets used in providing services were deemed appropriate under the Income Tax Act. The assets were considered to be used for generating income from house property, and allowing depreciation would result in double deduction. Therefore, the appeals on both issues were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 13:57:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 254 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233669</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing appeals by both the Revenue and the assessee. The treatment of license fees as income from house property and the disallowance of depreciation on assets used in providing services were deemed appropriate under the Income Tax Act. The assets were considered to be used for generating income from house property, and allowing depreciation would result in double deduction. Therefore, the appeals on both issues were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>