https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233660 The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant. The judge held that the appellant was entitled to a refund of interest on the wrongly reversed cenvat credit, as there was no requirement to reverse the credit for remission of duty on goods lost in accidents before the relevant rule amendment. The impugned order denying the interest refund was set aside, granting the appellant the relief sought. en-us Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Aug 2013 15:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233660 The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant. The judge held that the appellant was entitled to a refund of interest on the wrongly reversed cenvat credit, as there was no requirement to reverse the credit for remission of duty on goods lost in accidents before the relevant rule amendment. The impugned order denying the interest refund was set aside, granting the appellant the relief sought. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233660