<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 223 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233638</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that no addition for notional interest on interest-free deposits should be made to the Annual Letting Value (ALV) of a property leased to Canara Bank and ONGC. It held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s inclusion of notional interest in ALV was incorrect, emphasizing the importance of legal principles and consistency in ALV determination. The Tribunal rejected the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) directions to adjust ALV using internet data and cost inflation index, stating they lacked legal basis. Additionally, it upheld the principle of consistency in treating co-owners&#039; shares in ALV calculation, concluding that the ALV declared by the assessee should be accepted without further adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 06:16:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 223 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233638</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that no addition for notional interest on interest-free deposits should be made to the Annual Letting Value (ALV) of a property leased to Canara Bank and ONGC. It held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s inclusion of notional interest in ALV was incorrect, emphasizing the importance of legal principles and consistency in ALV determination. The Tribunal rejected the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) directions to adjust ALV using internet data and cost inflation index, stating they lacked legal basis. Additionally, it upheld the principle of consistency in treating co-owners&#039; shares in ALV calculation, concluding that the ALV declared by the assessee should be accepted without further adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>