https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233614 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, excluding certain companies as comparables for determining the Arm's Length Price. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's argument regarding the inappropriateness of considering companies engaged in engineering services and high-end consultancy as comparables, referencing a similar decision. Consequently, the exclusion of these companies led to the success of the appeal, rendering the stay granted in the matter infructuous. en-us Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233614 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, excluding certain companies as comparables for determining the Arm's Length Price. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's argument regarding the inappropriateness of considering companies engaged in engineering services and high-end consultancy as comparables, referencing a similar decision. Consequently, the exclusion of these companies led to the success of the appeal, rendering the stay granted in the matter infructuous. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233614