<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 190 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233605</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the CHA license due to the lack of proven charges against the appellant under the relevant regulations. Legal precedents, including the case of Rajan Virji &amp;amp; Co., supported this decision, emphasizing compliance with natural justice principles. The revocation was withdrawn immediately, aligning with the legal framework and precedents cited in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 05:39:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 190 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233605</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the CHA license due to the lack of proven charges against the appellant under the relevant regulations. Legal precedents, including the case of Rajan Virji &amp;amp; Co., supported this decision, emphasizing compliance with natural justice principles. The revocation was withdrawn immediately, aligning with the legal framework and precedents cited in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>