<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 189 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233604</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a Public Sector Company, in their claim for a refund of extra duty paid under Project Import Regulations in 1982. The appellant provided evidence, including a Chartered Accountant&#039;s Certificate and balance sheets, showing the amounts as &#039;Receivables&#039; from the department. The audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General confirmed the amounts were due but not yet received. Despite the Department&#039;s argument of unjust enrichment, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal for consequential refunds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 05:39:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 189 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233604</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a Public Sector Company, in their claim for a refund of extra duty paid under Project Import Regulations in 1982. The appellant provided evidence, including a Chartered Accountant&#039;s Certificate and balance sheets, showing the amounts as &#039;Receivables&#039; from the department. The audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General confirmed the amounts were due but not yet received. Despite the Department&#039;s argument of unjust enrichment, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal for consequential refunds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>